Anahata Solutions (EN)

An international team
of experts specializing
in complex commercial disputes: tenders, regulatory pressure, losses, asset -
related conflicts, and debt recovery. We step in when comprehensive analysis, interdisciplinary thinking,
and full control over the
facts are essential.

Since 2005

We combine legal, managerial,
and financial analysis to see not
only the position, but also the path
to achieving it.

An external strategic partner who transforms fragmented information
into a comprehensive picture of assets, connections, and risks — increasing clarity in the project while reducing hidden risks and unnecessary costs.

An international team of experts specializing in complex commercial disputes: tenders, regulatory pressure, losses, asset-related conflicts, and debt recovery. We step in when comprehensive analysis, interdisciplinary thinking, and full control over the facts are essential.

Since 2005

We combine legal, managerial, and financial analysis to see not only the position, but also the path to confidently achieving it.

A strategic partner who turns
fragmented data into a clear view
of assets, connections, and risks — bringing clarity and cutting hidden costs.

Anahata Solutions

What holds back progress in resolving

a cross-border commercial dispute?

001.

Lack of access to critical information

In cross-border disputes, essential data on assets, beneficiaries, transactions, or corporate structure is often deliberately concealed
or protected by local disclosure restrictions. This complicates strategic positioning, weakens decision-making, and limits project control.

Contact

002.

Fragmented and unusable information

In cross-border disputes, key data on assets, beneficiaries, transactions, and corporate structures is often hidden or restricted by local laws — complicating strategic planning, weakening decision-making, and limiting control over the project.

Contact

003.

Uncertainty in choosing the right course of action

In international disputes, each decision — from forum to jurisdiction to strategy — shapes the outcome. Without access to reliable data and a basis for comparison, teams operate on assumptions, struggle to align, and face a higher risk of strategic missteps.

Contact

004.

Loss of direction due to unstructured actions

Responding to the other party’s moves, addressing regulatory inquiries, clarifying procedural documents, and handling other forced actions gradually erode control over the conflict and weaken strategic planning. The team shifts into a reactive mode, focusing on execution rather than project management.

Contact

005.

Lack of execution infrastructure

Legal expertise in the project may be well-structured, but once
a decision is obtained, there’s no team or tools in place to carry it
out — from asset tracing and valuation to enforcement, freezing, and recovery of hidden assets.

Contact

001.

Lack of access to critical information 

In cross-border disputes, essential data on assets, beneficiaries, transactions, or corporate structure
is often deliberately concealed or protected by local disclosure restrictions. This complicates strategic positioning, weakens decision-making, and limits project control.

Contact

002.

Fragmented and unusable information 

In international disputes, large volumes
of data accumulate from multiple jurisdictions, business entities, and events. Without structure, it’s impossible to identify what matters most, establish cause-and-effect links, and build a coherent case study. In a highly dynamic environment, this prevents decision-making, weakens positioning, and delays team engagement in execution. 

Contact

003.

Uncertainty in choosing the right course

In international disputes, there is no single scenario — the choice of arbitration, jurisdiction, or action plan
leads to different outcomes. Without access to relevant information and a framework for comparison, the team operates on assumptions, making alignment difficult, weakening arguments, and increasing the risk
of strategic mistakes.

Contact

004.

Loss of direction from unstructured actions

Responding to the other party’s moves,
addressing regulatory inquiries, clarifying
procedural documents, and handling other forced actions gradually erode control over the conflict
and weaken strategic planning. The team shifts
into a reactive mode, focusing on execution rather
than project management.

Contact

005.

Lack of execution infrastructure

Legal expertise in the project may be well-structured, but once a decision is obtained, there’s no team
or tools in place to carry it out — from asset tracing and valuation to enforcement, freezing, and recovery of hidden assets. 

Contact

Create more impact in less time

Productivity

Efficiency

Strategy

Focus

Results

Anahata Solutions

Our solutions

001.

Resolution Mode

Strategic model of project management

A comprehensive roadmap for resolving a cross-
border commercial dispute, transforming the project
from a set of parallel initiatives into a coordinated sequence of decisions — focusing efforts on practical actions that deliver maximum impact.

002.

Data Research

A process that uncovers assets, structures, and concealed details.

It serves as a source of evidence, developed in line with local requirements, international disclosure practices, and evidentiary standards. Data Research not only identifies critical information but also documents it for use in negotiations, court proceedings, or arbitration.

003.

Project Transformation

Transforming projects
for conflict resolution

A restart mechanism in cross-border disputes when context changes, resources are strained, and direction is unclear — restoring control through management restructuring, resource optimization, tactical recalibration, and clear success criteria.

004.

Expert Opinions

Practical and professional
solutions for business problems

A comprehensive opinion that provides interdisciplinary answers to complex questions arising in the project due to enforcement gaps, data ambiguity, or multiple possible courses of action — ensuring predictable progress amid uncertainty and limited resources.

Anahata Solutions

Our solutions

001.

Execution

Execution, analytics and conflict resolution strategy

A set of actions, know-how, and infrastructure that enables swift and predictable recovery of assets, international debt, and dispute resolution — through a partnership between the client and Anahata Solutions. 

Challenges that require solutions

Resolution Mode

It’s difficult to launch the project due to the lack of a roadmap toward the final outcome.

The project involves significant expenses, but there’s no transparent resolution scenario.

Uncontrolled risks are identified at the outset, and they cannot be assessed without modeling.

There is no methodology for evaluating risks and scenarios — the financial consequences of decisions remain unclear.

There’s no control over processes or risk forecasting within the project.

Challenges that require solutions

Data Research

Verified data is missing — the team is unable to make strategic decisions or assess risks.

There is no complete picture of the debtor’s assets, structure, and affiliated entities.

Information is fragmented or outdated — most efforts are spent on filtering and searching.

The relevant jurisdiction is unclear — there is a lack of analysis and legal guidance to inform the choice.

Actions are initiated without assessing feasibility — creating a gap between strategy and execution.

Детальніше

Challenges that require solutions

Project Transformation

The strategy is no longer relevant — roles, KPIs, and focus on execution haven’t been updated.

There is no functional focus — roles overlap or critical expertise is missing.

Costs exceed the budget, and resource decisions are made reactively.

Implementation slows down due to shifting context, ad hoc actions, and active resistance from debtors.

The project is blocked by sanctions, asset freezes, or account suspensions — and there’s no adaptation plan.

Challenges that require solutions

Expert Opinions

Justifying a position in an international dispute requires an independent opinion on the substance of local law.

A controversial issue driven by ambiguous case law, unclear legislation, or unique facts — requiring expert resolution.

The project involves too many high-risk and hard-to-predict factors in a cross-border conflict.

Project progress triggers an independent expert review, often requested by compliance, the board, or key stakeholders.

Project data is unstructured — spanning jurisdictions, complex assets, and chaotic volumes of information.

Детальніше

Challenges that require solutions

Execution

The project has entered the active phase, but key roles and responsibilities remain undefined.

Multiple teams are involved, yet there’s no unified operational plan or coordination framework.

Tasks are being completed, but there’s no system to track progress against strategic objectives.

Budget and resources are being consumed rapidly without transparent performance metrics.

Emerging issues are addressed reactively — there’s no mechanism for anticipating or containing them.

Stages of work

Four steps that shift the dynamics of the project

We begin with a session and analysis to identify key questions and data for shaping the technical brief.

We develop hypotheses and task scopes, refine data and risks, and turn them into actionable solutions.

We test hypotheses, structure facts and stakeholder interests, and consolidate everything into one working solution.

We deliver a solution backed by logic and argumentation, and implement it together with the client’s team.

Identifying leverage points

001.

Designing leverage

002.

Creating project impact

003.

Implementing the solution

004.

Our role in international

commercial disputes

Independent access to data and practices that change the course of a project 

Data used in arbitration, negotiations, and strategy enhancement — where open sources are not enough.

Business-oriented expertise that strengthens your legal strategy

We deliver solutions that reflect enforcement practice, the opponent’s business reality, and create rapid impact on the project.

A project roadmap
that accounts for all constraints and risks

Evaluation of possible actions, enforcement practices, political, regulatory, and jurisdictional risks — before the project even starts.

Structured analytics without overloading your team

Ready-to-use case studies, consolidated data, and verified connections — so you can focus
on strategic decisions.

Practical solutions and actions that account for hidden risks

Solutions tailored to asset structures, regulatory constraints, business practices, and the desired outcome.

Реалізація

проєкту

Визначення конкретної потреби

Ми проводимо вступну оцінку, аналізуємо бізнес-середовище
та з’ясовуємо, яку проблему
чи задачу потрібно вирішити.
На цьому етапі узгоджуємо ключові цілі, строки і формат взаємодії.

Підготовка аналітичного висновку чи плану дій

Поглиблено вивчаємо контекст, виявляємо приховані ризики й можливості. На основі отриманих даних формуємо детальний план дій, де визначаємо необхідні ресурси, шляхи реалізації та відповідальних осіб.

Підтримка та консультації на всіх етапах реалізації

Ми беремо на себе управління
проєктом і контролюємо його розвиток. Залучаємо потрібних фахівців, консультуємо з юридичних, фінансових та управлінських питань. Регулярно звітуємо про прогрес
і швидко реагуємо на нові виклики, щоб досягти запланованого результату.

Виконання проєкту

Команда клієнта та наші експерти реалізують план, контролюють прогрес і коригують дії для максимальної ефективності.

Завершення та розподілення активів

Підбиваємо підсумки, готуємо фінальне резюме та надаємо рекомендації. Якщо потрібно, допомагаємо з розподілом активів.

Case to Article

Case Studies

Hostile takeover
and asset recovery

001.

A comprehensive strategy combining legal, management, and financial analysis enabled
the investor to regain control of the company
in less than a month, block the opponent’s
actions, expose fictitious transactions,
and initiate asset recovery.

Read article

Recovery of $7
million after discrediting evidence

002.

The distributor filed a $7 million claim based
on fabricated reports. We proved the affiliation
of the “experts” who provided the evidence, identified regulatory violations, and secured debt recovery without prolonged litigation.

Read article

Restructuring of brand rights and sales channels

003.

Following the termination of trade relations,
the partner exploited the brand and sales channels for personal gain. We secured a new negotiation position for the client, restructured rights, and enabled market reentry without major losses.

Read article

Debt recovery after business transfer to
a new company

004.

After an attempt to avoid a $1.34 million
payment by transferring assets and changing
the corporate structure, we uncovered links between the companies, blocked the assets,
and secured repayment without bankruptcy
or prolonged litigation.

Read article

Debt collection
amid sanctions
and asset freezes

005.

After a payment refusal due to sanctions and SWIFT restrictions, we developed a comprehensive strategy that identified non-sanctioned assets, secured recognition of the award in other jurisdictions, and accelerated debt recovery.

Will be soon

International debt recovery from a holding group via affiliated companies 

006.

Instead of enforcing against a sanctioned
business unit, we developed a strategy
that leveraged the holding group's assets
and structures in alternative jurisdictions,
achieving faster results with minimal costs.

Will be soon

Exposure of sanctions link in an infrastructure tender

007.

We uncovered connections between a tender participant and sanctioned capital, enabling
the client to trigger a re-tender process based
on the participant’s violation of tender conditions.

Will be soon

FAQ

Question & Answer

001.

Debt recovery

—
—
—
—
—

Identification of debtor’s assets 
Assessment of financial capacity and risks Negotiation with debtors 
Development of recovery strategy  Monitoring of judgment enforcement

002.

Crisis management

—
—
—
—
—

Analysis of corporate conflicts
Development of settlement strategy
Coordination of negotiation processes
Strengthening arbitration strategies
Prevention of future conflicts

003.

Litigation and international arbitration

—

—
—
—

Enhancing legal strategies with local
business practices
Preparation of evidence base
Enforcement of court and arbitration awards
Prevention of procedural delays

004.

Asset tracing and recovery

—
—
—
—

Analysis of financial flows
Identification of hidden assets
Verification of intercompany links
Recovery of debts

005.

Corporate settlement

—
—
—
—

Risk assessment in corporate conflicts 
Asset protection in disputes
Structuring of corporate ownership  Implementation of corporate
governance strategies

006.

Audit and strategic planning

—
—
—
—

Market risk analysis
Assessment of financial and legal threats Development of crisis exit scenarios Formulation of long-term strategies