This case is about a situation where legal instruments alone would have been powerless — and time was working against the client from the very beginning.

A distributor in Kazakhstan refused to pay $7 million, citing false quality claims after switching to Chinese analogs. Anahata uncovered the manipulation, refuted the arguments and defended the client's interests.

This case is about a collaboration that began as a strategic partnership — but turned into a source of risk and loss. And how, through an analytical approach and a legally grounded expert opinion, it was possible not only to assess the damage but to regain control.

This case is a classic example of how formal legal mechanisms can fall short: the company disappears, but the business continues — just under a different legal shell. And how we bypassed the standard litigation route by using analytics, network tracing, and targeted legal action to resolve the conflict before trial.

This case is about a situation where a formal victory does not guarantee a real outcome. The arbitration was won, the legal arguments were strong, and the court ruling was in the client’s favor.

This case illustrates a situation where the debt formally arises within one company, while the actual financial capacity to repay it is distributed among several others operating in different countries.

This case illustrates a scenario where a tender appears formally competitive, yet behind the artificially low pricing lie significant risks: violations of integrity principles, opaque sources of funding, and connections to sanctioned entities.